Wikipedio:Generala debato

Uzez ica pagino por irga sugesto e debato pri generala aferi pri Wikipedio.
Anciena debato esas movata aden arkivo.

Por faciligar la debati generala, anke la Yahoo-forumo ido-wikipedio esas uzata.
Por abonar irez a http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ido-wikipedio/
o sendez vakua mesajo a ido-wikipedio-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Por membreso di la forumo es bezonata pregar aprobo (kontre-spamala agado).

Pro ke Wikipedio funcionez maxim bone, on devas sempre skribar kelka vorti e frazi importanta samamaniere. On povas skribar ank en sua propra maniero, ma la ligili bezonas unformeso. Memorez, ke omna manieri esas chanjebla, ma nun ula chanjo esus tre laboriginta, pro ke nia Wikipedio esas ja multa-pagina. - Artomo

Rubriki di pagini

En rubriki preferesas singularo. La skribanto dil texto devus unesme klarifar ed explikar la kazo o nociono mencionita en rubriko e lore singularo esas plu bona. Quankam ulatempe pluralo esas plu bona en rubriko. - Artomo

Streketo en rubriki

Se rubriko kontenas kompozita vorto (kompozajo), esus bona uzar streketo inter la parti. Tale ni esas polita e helpanta por lernanti di Ido. En normala texto on povas skribar sen streketo ma ligilizante ta vorto per kramponi on mustas memorar, ke la rubriko di la pagino kontenas streketo. - Artomo

Propra nomi

Propra nomi esas importanta por Wikipedio ed on mustas ligilizar li. Nun uzesas en texti formulizuro Prenomo Familio-nomo. Tale on ne devas ponderar pri nekonocata nomo, quo esas parto di familiala nomo. Suficas, ke skribanto adjuntos kramponi che propra nomi kreante ligilo. Regretinde tala ordino esas nebona en pagino di omna pagini. Pro lo esas importanta, ke skribanti kategoriizas pagini. Se ulu skribas pri ula homo, ca skribanto generale savas, qua parto en propra nomo esas familiala nomo, do uzinda en enciklopediala listi. - Artomo

Por skribar Rusa, Ukrainana, Bielorusa e Bulgara nomi, videz Helpo:Latinigado dil alfabeto Kirila (nur propozo de 2008).

Pri generala questioni pri latinigado di lingui kun nelatina alfabeti vu povas lektar l'artiklo: Latinigado.

Ordinala nombri

Dati esas importanta por funcionanta Wikipedio. Nun uzesas formulizuro X di monato en pagini pri ula dio (dato). Do ne Xma, qua esus plu Idala. Altralatere 1-esma, 2-esma, 8-esma, 10-esma abrevius nulo, 3-esma, 5-esma, 6-esma, 7-esma, 9-esma abrevius nur un signo e 4-esma du signi. Se ulu volas uzar formulizuro Xma di monato en sua texto, on povas ligilizar, por exemplo, tale: [[8 di marto|8ma di marto]]. En nomi di regnanti uzesas abreviuro Xma, exemple, Louis 14ma. - Artomo

Expliko inter parentezi che ligilo

La nomi di reji, regnanti e tala personi di diversa landi havas ula-foye sama formo. Tatempe esas bezonata explikar pri quo lando o stato on skribas. Uzez tala formulizuro: [[Louis 14ma (Francia)|Louis 14ma]], ma ne, por exemplo, [[Louis 14ma di Francia|Louis 14ma]] o [[Louis 14ma de Francia|Louis 14ma]]. – Atencez ke on povas skribar anke kurte [[Louis 14ma]]. Se existas altra rejo sama-nomala, on povas pose separar li uzante la pagino pri homonimeso. – Artomo 23:19, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC).

Yarcenti

Omna rubriki pri yarcenti havas formilizuro Xma yar-cento. - Artomo

Ante Kristo

Yari referanta tempo ante Kristo havas abreviaturo aK, do sen punti. En moderna linguo punti semblas superflua. La yari pos Kristo ne havas abreviuro pK, ma se ulu volas o texto bezonas l' abreviuro pK, on ne mustas juntar pK inter ligilizebla kramponi. - Artomo

Falsa vorti

Se vu trovas nekorekta vorto en Idala texto, juntez ol a listo pri sugestata vorti kun korekta formo. Tale la nedezirata vorto-formo ne esos repetita ed omnu povas chanjar olu. On povas trovar ula vorto-formo skribante che frontispico en buxeto la vorto e kliktante “serchar”. - Artomo

Extera ligili

Me trovis en reto multalinguala ligilaro en qua on povas trovor extera reto-situi uzebla por Wikipediala pagini. Vizitez http://dmoz.org/ . - Artomo

Ido interwikis where they're not wanted

Hi,

Not that I am a strong anti Ido personality or something like that, but it irritates me that on a lot of smaller Wikipedias the Ido interwiki is added to the local Main Page. This is OK when the list of interwikis is quite complete, but it is unasked for when the margin features only a few interwikis, usually the languages closest related to the local language and those that have some sort of relevance towards it in terms of proximity or being a major culture language. To be quite specific: at the Tok Pisin Wikipedia, there are only interikis to the English, Simple English, Indonesian, Malayan, Chinese, Javan, Sundanese, Japanese and German Wikipedias. An interwiki to io: would be completely out of place, yet someone placed it in. Please stop that, it is sheer spam! Caesarion 17:20, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Ido is the second international language and expect to become the first soon by the only force of its intrinsic value so it certainly deserve to have a very prominent place and certainly among the world top ten. Fafnir 19:58, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Caesarion - the link was added by someone in Spain, so it's hard to say who did it - certainly not one of us. I also helped you out with the other spam on your main page. Mithridates 23:20, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Ok, thank you Mithridates, I really hope it was not one of you, but it just seemed so likely... anyway Fafnir, your position is quite POV, as Ido is just spoken by a few 1000 speakers. How many people have heard of it at all? Even an interwiki to the Esperanto mean page would be highly doubtful, I think. (btw. most spam on that main page is much, much worse than this Ido interwiki, it's true) Caesarion 17:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Since there are so few Ido speakers and even available computer translator making it quite virtual for now it's why I said "intrinsic". Fafnir 19:12, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Question

Could this page be considered as the Ido Village Pump (en) or Bistro (fr)? Hégésippe | ±Θ± 16:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

As you see in the log there are very few participants so this wikipedia is a kind of "shadow boat", totally opposed to esperanto which is a weaker language but with an important community. Fafnir 21:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Um...I think what he means is 'yes'. *^^* We're kind of like doozers over here so I never really noticed the discussion area. Mithridates 09:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

[http://www.rsr.ch/view.asp?DomID=1895&clickedDate=06/14/2006#mercredi Rêver les langues par Marina Yaguello, Les langues imaginaires, éd. du Seuil]

Category for Movies by year

I hope that I am asking at the correct place. I would like to suggest to create a category collecting movie-per-year-categories like, for instance, Kategorio:2001 cinemo. What would be the correct name for such a category? Thanks in advance and greets, --Darev 17:23, 28 di decembro 2008 (UTC)

Fallback-linguo por omna projeti Idala: Esperanto od Angla?

Kelka dii ante nun 11 homi (di qua 2 programeri, 8 Esperantisti, 1 altru e 0 Idisti) chanjis la fallback-linguo di omna projeti Idala de Angla ad Espo. Frazo qua ne esis tradukita ad Ido montrus en Espo. Se ta frazo ne esis tradukita ad Espo, montrus en Angla.

Ido forsan heredis de Espo, ma la du lingui esas tote diferanta cadie. Esas tre plu facila por me komprenar Angla, vice Espo.

Vidinta en la kategorii por Angla-parolanti e por Espo-parolanti vi povas vidar ke esas tre plu multa parolanti hike qua komprenas Angla, vice parolanti qua komprenas Espo.

Me propozas retrochanjar la fallback-linguo ad Angla, co anke plufaciligas tradukar kozi nam olu igus trovar strings plu facile ye la traduko-wiki.

– Algentem [debato] [kontributo] 20:56, 12 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]

Suportas

Suporto Frank Kasper
Suporto por la kauzi super. – Algentem [debato] [kontributo] 20:56, 12 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto Joao Xavier (diskuto) 21:19, 12 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto Serg.belitzky 03:28, 13 jan. 2017 (GMT)
Suporto pro ke "la maxim bona linguo internaciona esas ta qua prizentas la maxim granda facileso por la maxim multa homi" (Jespersen). Se Ido ne esas disponebla, la Angla esas la linguo maxim komprenata dal Idistaro, segun la yena listo kompare a la yena listo. --TheLazyDog (diskuto) 23:03, 13 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto por la Angla til ke omna mesaji ed averti tradukesos aden Idolinguo. Lakaoso (diskuto) 23:26, 13 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto Me opinionas ke uzar la angla esas preferinda kam uzar Espo. Idojc (diskuto) 13:12, 14 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto Robin van der Vliet (diskuto) 14:16, 14 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto DavidW (diskuto) 14:47, 14 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto Uzanto: Partaka (Ca-kaze, anke me suportas l'Angla til ke omno tradukesos aden Ido)
Suporto Me anke opinionas ke uzar la Angla esas preferinda kam uzar Espo, til ke omno tradukesabos aden Ido.
Suporto Gonçalo Neves Anke me opinionas ke uzar la Angla esas preferinda kam uzar Esperanto, tam longe kam ne omno esos apte tradukita en Ido. Ne omna Idisti ed Ido-uzanti povas lektar Esperanto fluante, ma omna Wikipediala Idisti ed Ido-uzanti certe komprenas la Angla e povas lektar ol fluante.
Suporto Wilcynic: La chanjo desfaciligas uzar la Ido Wikipedio, por me, se ne altri.
Suporto --Artomo (diskuto) 08:04, 15 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]

Opozas

Tradukuro por la nomospaci relatanta uzanti

La nomospaci por la konti esas prezente nomata « Uzanto » . Me judikas ke ni devos rinomizar ica nomospaco ad « Uzero » nam « Uzanto » nur fitas se la aganto esas enreta, se la aganto esas ekreta, lo korekta esus « Uzinto », e por li qua ne ankore kreis konto, li kreos « Uzonto », e.c. Me anke propzas rinomar « Uzanto Debato » ad « Uzerodebato ». Se ni rinomizus, nula ligilo ruptos o cesos funcionar, la sistemo aktualigus su ipsa.

– Algentem [debato] [kontributo] 20:56, 12 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]

Suportas

Suporto por la kauzi super. – Algentem [debato] [kontributo] 20:56, 12 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto me ja tradukis tale dum longa tempo. 'Uzero' es plu apta kam 'uzanto'. Lakaoso (diskuto) 23:30, 13 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto Robin van der Vliet (diskuto) 14:16, 14 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto pro korekteso. --TheLazyDog (diskuto) 15:23, 14 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]
Suporto. Unionita, ni esas plu forta! :) Joao Xavier (diskuto) 19:51, 14 jan. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]

Opozas

New notification when a page is connected to Wikidata

Hello all,

(Please help translate to your language)

The Wikidata development team is about to deploy a new feature on all Wikipedias. It is a new type of notification (via Echo, the notification system you see at the top right of your wiki when you are logged in), that will inform the creator of a page, when this page is connected to a Wikidata item.

You may know that Wikidata provides a centralized system for all the interwikilinks. When a new page is created, it should be connected to the corresponding Wikidata item, by modifying this Wikidata item. With this new notification, editors creating pages will be informed when another editor connects this page to Wikidata.

This feature will be deployed on May 30th on all the Wikipedias, excepting English, French and German. This feature will be disable by default for existing editors, and enabled by default for new editors.

This is the first step of the deployments, the Wikipedias and other Wikimedia projects will follow in the next months.

If you have any question, suggestion, please let me know by pinging me. You can also follow and leave a comment on the Phabricator ticket.

Thanks go to Matěj Suchánek who developed this feature!

Danko! Lea Lacroix (WMDE) (talk)

m:Requests for comment/Global centralnotice for the blockade of the Turkish government

Hi, you are invited to participate in the discussion on the proposal to make a banner through m: centralnotice to inform more people around the world about what the Turkish government has done about Wikipedia, ie all the language versions of Wikipedia are You are obscured, so in Turkey it is impossible to view the * .wikipedia.org site. To hope that the Turkish government will remove the block, it is necessary to raise awareness of this fact around the world because it is important to succeed in this mission because Wikipedia can not be seen in Turkey. With this message also for those interested, I invite him to sign the Wikimedian appeal.

If you have any questions or questions do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks best regards. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 20:05, 27 may. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]

Wikidata changes now also appear in enhanced recent changes

Hello, and sorry to write this message in English. You can help translating it.

Starting from today, you will be able to display Wikidata changes in both modes of the recent changes and the watchlist.

Read and translate the full message

Danko! Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 08:33, 29 jun. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]

(wrong target page? you can fix it here)

Improved search in deleted pages archive

Please help translate to your language

During Wikimedia Hackathon 2016, the Discovery team worked on one of the items on the 2015 community wishlist, namely enabling searching the archive of deleted pages. This feature is now ready for production deployment, and will be enabled on all wikis, except Wikidata.

Right now, the feature is behind a feature flag - to use it on your wiki, please go to the Special:Undelete page, and add &fuzzy=1 to the URL, like this: https://test.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AUndelete&fuzzy=1. Then search for the pages you're interested in. There should be more results than before, due to using ElasticSearch indexing (via the CirrusSearch extension).

We plan to enable this improved search by default on all wikis soon (around August 1, 2017). If you have any objections to this - please raise them with the Discovery team via email or on this announcement's discussion page. Like most Mediawiki configuration parameters, the functionality can be configured per wiki. Once the improved search becomes the default, you can still access the old mode using &fuzzy=0 in the URL, like this: https://test.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AUndelete&fuzzy=0

Please note that since Special:Undelete is an admin-only feature, this search capability is also only accessible to wiki admins.

Danko! CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 18:39, 25 jul. 2017 (UTC)[respondez]

presenting the project Wikipedia Cultural Diversity Observatory and asking for a vounteer in Ido Wikipedia

Hello everyone,

My name is Marc Miquel and I am a researcher from Barcelona (Universitat Pompeu Fabra). While I was doing my PhD I studied whether an identity-based motivation could be important for editor participation and I analyzed content representing the editors' cultural context in 40 Wikipedia language editions. Few months later, I propose creating the Wikipedia Cultural Diversity Observatory in order to raise awareness on Wikipedia’s current state of cultural diversity, providing datasets, visualizations and statistics, and pointing out solutions to improve intercultural coverage.

I am presenting this project to a grant and I expect that the site becomes a useful tool to help communities create more multicultural encyclopaedias and bridge the content culture gap that exists across language editions (one particular type of systemic bias). For instance, this would help spreading cultural content local to Ido Wikipedia into the rest of Wikipedia language editions, and viceversa, make Ido Wikipedia much more multicultural. Here is the link of the project proposal: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Wikipedia_Cultural_Diversity_Observatory_(WCDO)

I am searching for a volunteer in each language community: I still need one for the Ido Wikipedia. If you feel like it, you can contact me at: marcmiquel *at* gmail.com I need a contact in your every community who can (1) check the quality of the cultural context article list I generate to be imported-exported to other language editions, (2) test the interface/data visualizations in their language, and (3) communicate the existance of the tool/site when ready to the language community and especially to those editors involved in projects which could use it or be aligned with it. Communicating it might not be a lot of work, but it will surely have a greater impact if done in native language! :). If you like the project, I'd ask you to endorse it in the page I provided. In any case, I will appreciate any feedback, comments,... Thanks in advance for your time! Best regards, --Marcmiquel (diskuto) 08:22, 10 okt. 2017 (UTC) Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona[respondez]

Time to bring embedded maps (‘mapframe’) to most Wikipedias

Time to bring embedded maps (‘mapframe’) to most Wikipedias

Please help translate to your language

Mapframe is a feature that enables users to easily display interactive maps right on wiki pages. Currently, most Wikipedias don’t have mapframe. But fifteen Wikipedias, along with all the other Wikimedia projects, are using mapframe today to display maps on thousands of pages.

A little background: over the last few months, the Foundation’s Collaboration team has been working to improve the stability and user experience of the maps service. In addition, a question about long-term support for the maps service was recently settled, and a small team has been assigned for routine maintenance. Given these developments, bringing the benefits of mapframe to Wikipedias that lack the feature seems both safe and supportable. Nine Wikipedias that use a stricter version of Flagged Revisions will not get mapframe in this release.

Maps are a valuable form of visual data that can improve readers’ understanding across a wide range of topics. If you know of any reasons why mapframe shouldn’t be implemented on your Wikipedia, let us know on the project talk page. Unless we hear from you, we plan to release mapframe to most Wikipedias in May, 2018. So, if you foresee an issue, please let us hear from you. Otherwise, happy mapping!

CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 21:38, 24 apr. 2018 (UTC)[respondez]

Update on page issues on mobile web

Update on page issues on mobile web

Please help translate to your language Hi everyone. The Readers web team has recently begun working on exposing issue templates on the mobile website. Currently, details about issues with page content are generally hidden on the mobile website. This leaves readers unaware of the reliability of the pages they are reading. The goal of this project is to improve awareness of particular issues within an article on the mobile web. We will do this by changing the visual styling of page issues.

So far, we have drafted a proposal on the design and implementation of the project. We were also able to run user testing on the proposed designs. The tests so far have positive results. Here is a quick summary of what we learned:

The new treatment increases awareness of page issues among participants. This is true particularly when they are in a more evaluative/critical mode.
Page issues make sense to readers and they understand how they work
Readers care about page issues and consider them important
Readers had overwhelmingly positive sentiments towards Wikipedia associated with learning about page issues

Our next step would be to start implementing these changes. We wanted to reach out to you for any concerns, thoughts, and suggestions you might have before beginning development. Please visit the project page where we have more information and mockups of how this may look. Please leave feedback on the talk page.

CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 12 jun. 2018 (UTC)[respondez]

Enabling a helpful feature for Template editors

Hello.

The team working on TemplateStyles at the Wikimedia Foundation would like to enable TemplateStyles on this wiki.

TemplateStyles is a feature to allow non-administrators to write and manage CSS styles for templates. It allows contributors who edit templates to separate content and presentation. A good web practice that makes it easier to manage the layout of templates. If you don't edit templates, this will not have any impact on your contributions.

TemplateStyles is useful for a few reasons.

It makes it possible for templates to work better on mobile.
It cuts out confusion on where to apply CSS rules.
Editing CSS is currently limited to administrators, which is a major barrier to participation.
All stylesheets must be loaded on all pages (whether they actually use the page or not), which wastes bandwidth and makes debugging style rules more difficult.

You can learn more about TemplateStyles on MediaWiki.org. Technical documentation is also available.

This is an optional feature and no one must use it, but template contributors are encouraged to do so! Please discuss and let us know if there are any concerns. If there are no concerns we will proceed to deploy the feature on the 9th of August.

Thank you.

CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 21:28, 6 di agosto. 2018 (UTC)[respondez]

IMPORTANT: Admin activity review

Hello. A policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc. ) was adopted by global community consensus in 2013. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis with no inactivity policy. To the best of our knowledge, your wiki does not have a formal process for removing "advanced rights" from inactive accounts. This means that the stewards will take care of this according to the admin activity review.

We have determined that the following users meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for more than 2 years):

User:Mithridates

These users will receive a notification soon, asking them to start a community discussion if they want to retain some or all of their rights. If the users do not respond, then their advanced rights will be removed by the stewards.

However, if you as a community would like to create your own activity review process superseding the global one, want to make another decision about these inactive rights holders, or already have a policy that we missed, then please notify the stewards on Meta-Wiki so that we know not to proceed with the rights review on your wiki. Thanks, --MarcoAurelio (diskuto) 18:07, 28 jan. 2019 (UTC)[respondez]

Bon, me recevis la mesajo anke sur mea debato-pagino. Fakte la manko di aktiveso esis pro ke Joao esas tam aktiva ke me ne devis desfacar spamo. Kompreneble anke pro ke me skribas nun preske sole en Occidental ma me venas hike ofte por vidar la chanji. Mithridates (diskuto) 06:45, 29 jan. 2019 (UTC)[respondez]

Wikidata Bridge: edit Wikidata’s data from Wikipedia infoboxes

Sorry for writing this message in English - feel free to help us translating it :)

Hello all,

Many language versions of Wikipedia use the content of Wikidata, the centralized knowledge base, to fill out the content of infoboxes. The data is stored in Wikidata and displayed, partially or completely, in the Wikipedia’s language, on the articles. This feature is used by many template editors, but brought several issues that were raised by communities in various places: not being able to edit the data directly from Wikipedia was one of them.

This is the reason why the Wikidata Bridge project started, with the goal of offering a way to Wikipedia editors to edit Wikidata’s data more easily. This will be achieved by an interface, connected to the infobox, that users can access directly from their local wiki.

The project is now at an early stage of development. A lot of user research has been done, and will continue to be done through the different phases of the project. The next steps of development will be achieved by the development team working at Wikimedia Deutschland, starting now until the end of 2019.

In order to make sure that we’re building a tool that is answering editors’ needs, we’re using agile methods in our development process. We don’t start with a fixed idea of the tool we want to deliver: we will build it together with the editors, based on feedback loops that we will regularly organize. The first version will not necessarily have all of the features you want, but it will keep evolving.

Here’s the planned timeline:

From June to August, we will build the setup and technical groundwork.
From September to November 2019, we will develop the first version of the feature and publish a test system so you can try it and give feedback.
Later on, we will test the feature on a few projects, in collaboration with the communities.
- We will first focus on early adopters communities who already implemented a shortcut from their infoboxes to edit Wikidata (for example Russian, Catalan, Basque Wikipedias)
- but we also welcome also communities who volunteer to be part of the first test round.
- Then we will reach some of the big Wikipedias (French, German, English) in order to see if the project scales and to address their potentially different needs.
- Even later, we can consider enabling the feature on all the other projects.

In any case, no deployment or big change will be enforced on the projects without talking to the communities first, and helping the template builders to prepare for the changes they will have to do on the infoboxes’ code.

If you want to get involved, there are several ways to help:

Read and help translating the documentation pages
Follow the updates and participate in the first feedback loop
Talk about it with your local community

More ideas will be added on this page along the way

If you have any questions for the development team, feel free to ask them on the main talk page. You can also ask under this message, but if you expect an answer from me, please make sure to ping me.

Thanks for your attention, Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 13:03, 24 jun. 2019 (UTC)[respondez]

Wikipedia Asian Month 2019

Please help translate to your language

Wikipedia Asian Month is back! We wish you all the best of luck for the contest. The basic guidelines of the contest can be found on your local page of Wikipedia Asian Month. For more information, refer to our Meta page for organizers.

Looking forward to meet the next ambassadors for Wikipedia Asian Month 2019!

For additional support for organizing offline event, contact our international team on wiki or on email. We would appreciate the translation of this message in the local language by volunteer translators. Thank you!

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team.

MediaWiki message delivery (diskuto) 16:57, 31 okt. 2019 (UTC)[respondez]

Extension of Wikipedia Asian Month contest

In consideration of a week-long internet block in Iran, Wikipedia Asian Month 2019 contest has been extended for a week past November. The articles submitted till 7th December 2019, 23:59 UTC will be accepted by the fountain tools of the participating wikis.

Please help us translate and spread this message in your local language.

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (diskuto) 14:16, 27 nov. 2019 (UTC)[respondez]

Wiki Loves Folklore

Hello Folks,

Wiki Loves Love is back again in 2020 iteration as Wiki Loves Folklore from 1 February, 2020 - 29 February, 2020. Join us to celebrate the local cultural heritage of your region with the theme of folklore in the international photography contest at Wikimedia Commons. Images, videos and audios representing different forms of folk cultures and new forms of heritage that haven’t otherwise been documented so far are welcome submissions in Wiki Loves Folklore. Learn more about the contest at Meta-Wiki and Commons.

Kind regards,
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk)
sent using MediaWiki message delivery (diskuto) 06:14, 18 jan. 2020 (UTC)[respondez]

Global ban proposal for Kubura

Please help translate to your language.

Hello. This is to notify the community that there is an ongoing global ban proposal for Kubura who has been active on this wiki. You are invited to participate at m:Request for comment/Global ban for Kubura. Thank you.

— regards, Revi, delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (diskuto) 16:39, 17 nov. 2020 (UTC)[respondez]

Global bot policy proposal: invitation to a Meta discussion

Saluto!

I apologize for sending a message in English. Please help translate to your language. According to the list, your wiki project currently is opted in to the global bot policy. Under this policy, bots that fix double redirects or maintain interwiki links are allowed to operate under a global bot flag that is assigned directly by the stewards.

As the Wikimedia projects developed, the need for the current global bot policy decreased, and in the past years, no bots were appointed via that policy. That is mainly given Wikidata were estabilished in 2013, and it is no longer necessary to have dozens of bots that maintain interwiki links.

A proposal was made at Meta-Wiki, which proposes that the stewards will be authorized to determine whether an uncontroversial task may be assigned a global bot flag. The stewards already assign permissions that are more impactful on many wikis, namely, global sysops and global renamers, and I do not think that trust should be an issue. The stewards will assign the permission only to time-proven bots that are already approved at a number of projects, like ListeriaBot.

By this message, I would like to invite you to comment in the global RFC, to voice your opinion about this matter.

Thank you for your time.

Best regards,
Martin Urbanec (diskutez) 11:49, 24 nov. 2020 (UTC)[respondez]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is back!

Please help translate to your language

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Please support us in translating the project page and a banner message to help us spread the word in your native language.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (diskuto) 13:25, 6 feb. 2021 (UTC)[respondez]

Proposal: Set two-letter project shortcuts as alias to project namespace globally

Please help translate to your language

Hello everyone,

I apologize for posting in English. I would like to inform everyone that I created a new global request for comment (GRFC) at Meta Wiki, which may affect your project: m:Requests for comment/Set short project namespace aliases by default globally.

In this GRFC, I propose that two-project shortcuts for project names will become a default alias for the project namespace. For instance, on all Wikipedias, WP will be an alias to the Wikipedia: namespace (and similar for other projects). Full list is available in the GRFC.

This is already the case for Wikivoyages, and many individual projects asked for this alias to be implemented. I believe this makes it easier to access the materials in the project namespace, as well as creating shortcuts like WP:NPOV, as well as helps new projects to use this feature, without having to figure out how to request site configuration changes first.

As far as I can see, Wikipedio currently does not have such an alias set. This means that such an alias will be set for you, if the GRFC is accepted by the global community.

I would like to ask all community members to participate in the request for comment at Meta-Wiki, see m:Requests for comment/Set short project namespace aliases by default globally.

Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions about this proposal.

Best regards,
--Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:12, 18 feb. 2021 (UTC)[respondez]

Global bot policy changes

Saluto!

I apologize for sending a message in English. Please help translate to your language. According to the list, your wiki project is currently opted in to the global bot policy. As such, I want to let you know about some changes that were made after the global RfC was closed.

Global bots are now subject to a 2 week discussion, and it'll be publicized via a MassMessage list, available at Bot policy/New global bot discussion on Meta. Please subscribe yourself or your wiki if you are interested in new global bots proposals.
For a bot to be considered for approval, it must demonstrate it is welcomed in multiple projects, and a good way to do that is to have the bot flag on at least 5 wikis for a single task.
The bot operator should make sure to adhere to the wiki's preference as related to the use of the bot flag (i.e., if a wiki doesn't want a bot to use the flag as it edits, that should be followed).

Thank you for your time.

Best regards,
—Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 18:48, 6 apr. 2021 (UTC)[respondez]

Global ban proposal for Musée Annam

Apologies for writing in English. Please help translate to your language There is an on-going discussion about a proposal that Musée Annam be globally banned from editing all Wikimedia projects. You are invited to participate at Requests for comment/Global ban for Musée Annam on Meta-Wiki. Danko! NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (diskutez) 14:22, 27 dec. 2021 (UTC)[respondez]

Wiki Loves Folklore is back!

Please help translate to your language

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

You can also organize a local contest in your country and support us in translating the project pages to help us spread the word in your native language.

Feel free to contact us on our project Talk page if you need any assistance.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (diskuto) 13:15, 9 jan. 2022 (UTC)[respondez]

Subscribe to the This Month in Education newsletter - learn from others and share your stories

Dear community members,

Greetings from the EWOC Newsletter team and the education team at Wikimedia Foundation. We are very excited to share that we on tenth years of Education Newsletter (This Month in Education) invite you to join us by subscribing to the newsletter on your talk page or by sharing your activities in the upcoming newsletters. The Wikimedia Education newsletter is a monthly newsletter that collects articles written by community members using Wikimedia projects in education around the world, and it is published by the EWOC Newsletter team in collaboration with the Education team. These stories can bring you new ideas to try, valuable insights about the success and challenges of our community members in running education programs in their context.

If your affiliate/language project is developing its own education initiatives, please remember to take advantage of this newsletter to publish your stories with the wider movement that shares your passion for education. You can submit newsletter articles in your own language or submit bilingual articles for the education newsletter. For the month of January the deadline to submit articles is on the 20th January. We look forward to reading your stories.

Older versions of this newsletter can be found in the complete archive.

More information about the newsletter can be found at Education/Newsletter/About.

For more information, please contact spatnaik@wikimedia.org.

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony ^(Talk), merkurdio 9:32, 30 di oktobro 2024 (UTC)

Vote for your favourite Wikimedia sound logo

Please help translate to your language
We are really sorry for posting in English

Voting in the Wikimedia sound logo contest has started. From December 6 to 19, 2022, please play a part and help chose the sound that will identify Wikimedia content on audio devices. Learn more on Diff.

The sound logo team is grateful to everyone who participated in this global contest. We received 3,235 submissions from 2,094 participants in 135 countries. We are incredibly grateful to the team of volunteer screeners and the selection committee who, among others, helped bring us to where we are today. It is now up to Wikimedia to choose the Sound Of All Human Knowledge.

Best wishes, Arupako-WMF (diskuto) 10:07, 16 dec. 2022 (UTC)[respondez]

Global ban for PlanespotterA320/RespectCE

Per the Global bans policy, I'm informing the project of this request for comment: m:Requests for comment/Global ban for PlanespotterA320 (2) about banning a member from your community. Thank you.--Lemonaka (talk) 21:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Global ban proposal for Piermark/House of Yahweh/HoY

Apologies for writing in English. If this is not the proper place to post, please move it somewhere more appropriate. Please help translate to your language There is an on-going discussion about a proposal that Piermark/House of Yahweh/HoY be globally banned from editing all Wikimedia projects. You are invited to participate at Requests for comment/Global ban for Piermark on Meta-Wiki. Danko! U.T. (diskutez) 12:36, 4 may. 2023 (UTC)[respondez]