Uzanto Debato:Johannnes89

Bonveno!

Ni bonvenigas vu a la Wikipedio en Ido, Johannnes89, e ni dankas vu tre multe pro vua kontributi.

Yen kelka ligili a pagini quin vu forsan trovos utila:

Introdukto – yen kelka informo pri quale komencar vua vizito ye Wikipedio en Ido.
Portalo di la komunitato – esas la pagino por trovar quo eventas en Wikipedio.
Diskutinda pagini – hike vu povas facar demandi, sugesti o prizentar propozaji.

Vu anke povas kunlaborar editante l'artikli qui ja publikigesis por plubonigor li, o krear nova artikli pri temi quin vu bone konocas. Reda ligili havas nula artikli asociata, e se vu volas skribor pri nova temo qua ne havas ula ligilo kreata, unesme vu mustas serchar existanta artiklo relatanta por krear ligilo a vua nova skribajo ibe. Vu povas krear la bezonata ligilo ank en Probeyo.

Ne timez pri ne skribar artikli per perfekta Ido! Plu savata Idisti revizos e korektigos li pose. Simple atachez la ligilo {{Revizo}} ye la komenco dil artiklo, ed olu aparos en la fako «revizinda pagini» por altra Idisti revizor.

En vua uzanto-pagino vu povas mencionar vua matrala linguo, altra lingui quin vu parolas, e vua savo pri Ido, exemple: {{Babel|fr|es-3|en-2|io-1}}. Se vu ne parolas Ido bone, vu povas skribar en l'Angla, la Hispana, la Franca, e.c. ad altra Idisti.

Don't speak Ido? Here's some information in English

IN ENGLISH: On your personal page you can mention the languages you speak (including your native language) and your knowledge of Ido, for example: {{Babel|en|es-2|io-1}}. If you don't speak Ido (io-0), you can write to us about whatever is on your mind in English.

¿No hablas el Ido? Siguen algunas informaciones en español

EN ESPAÑOL: En su página de usuario, puede mencionar las lenguas que habla, y su conocimiento del idioma Ido, por ejemplo: {{Babel|es|ca-3|en-2|io-1}}. Si vos no hablas el Ido (io-0) puede escribirnos sus dudas en español.

Vous ne parlez pas Ido? Voici quelques informations en français

EN FRANÇAIS: Dans votre page utilisateur, vous pouvez mentionner les langues que vous parlez (en plus de votre langue maternelle), et vos connaissanses en Ido, comme par exemple: {{Babel|fr|ca-3|en-2|io-1}}. Si vous ne parlez pas Ido (io-0) vouz pouvez nous écrire vos doutes en français.

Não fala Ido? Eis algumas informações em português

EM PORTUGUÊS: Na sua página de usuário, poderá dizer qual é a sua língua materna, outras línguas que fale, e seu nível de conhecimento do Ido, por exemplo: {{Babel|pt|es-3|en-2|io-1}}. Se não falar Ido (io-0), pode escrever-nos em português.

Juez vua tempo hike en Wikipedio, e ni anke juos kunlaborar kun vu!

Best regards, Joao Xavier (diskuto) 09:40, 16 jan. 2024 (UTC)[respondez]

re:Crosswiki spams

Hi, Johannes! Sometimes I did this (erasing the page and restoring it without the spam) in order to eliminate any kind of "pleasure" or "personal delight" for the spammer, in the history of the page. I'm one of the few persons who write articles in Ido Wikipedia, so I have a lot of hard work to do (review errors, improve texts with informations, write new texts)... and I see that some spammers are persistent. (I think that) probably some of them feel some kind of "pleasure" or "personal delight" when attacking continuously an article, kind of saying to themselves: "oh, I've attacked this article X times, I made them work a lot to restore it, I'm 'fantastic'...". By eliminating their text from the history, I intended to "eliminate their pleasure of seing the results of their attack". But if you consider this a sort of exaggeration of mine, or if anyway this attitude of mine is against Wikipedia's policies, I will stop it. Best regards from São Paulo, Brazil. Joao Xavier (diskuto) 09:55, 16 jan. 2024 (UTC)[respondez]

Hi @Joao Xavier, thanks for your detailed answer! I understand your motivation and agree that it's certainly useful in some cases to remove the result of attacks. Generally speaking I know that even large projects handle these things differently – revision deletions of spam links are quite frequent e.g. at kowiki or plwiki, while my homewiki (dewiki) doesn't do revision deletions of spam links at all. So you can do it however you want, I was really just asking out of curiosity, because I was surprised to see it (usually people just use the revision deletion feature because it's easier then deletion and restoring without the spam, especially if an article has a large version history). Best regards from Berlin, Germany :) --Johannnes89 (diskuto) 10:25, 16 jan. 2024 (UTC)[respondez]